Metrics
No | NAME | Attachments |
| 6.1.1 | The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution. | Click here |
| 6.1.2 | Effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management | Click here |
| 6.2.1 | The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed. | Click Here |
| 6.2.2 | The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc. | Click here |
| 6.2.3 | Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
1. Administration
2. Finance and Accounts
3. Student Admission and Support
4. Examination | Click here |
| 6.3.1 | The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff | Click here |
| 6.3.2 | The average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/ workshops and towards membership fees of professional bodies during the last five years. | Click here |
| 6.3.3 | The average number of professional development/ administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non-teaching staff during the last five years | Click here |
| 6.3.4 | The average percentage of teachers undergoing online/face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP) during the last five years (Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short Term Course, etc. | Click here |
| 6.3.5 | Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff | Click here |
| 6.4.1 | The institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly | Click here |
| 6.4.2 | Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropies during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III) | Click here |
| 6.4.3 | Institutional strategies for mobilization of funds and the optimal utilization of resources | Click here |
| 6.5.1 | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly to institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes | Click here |
| 6.5.2 | The institution reviews its teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities (For first cycle - Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality) | Click here |
| 6.5.3 | Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:
1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC); Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements.
2. Collaborative quality initiatives
3. Participation in NIRF
4. any other quality audit recognized by the state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA) with other institution(s) | Click here |