SSR Criteria 2

 

CRITERIA 2                                                               

 Metric number      2.1

        Criterion 2- Teaching- Learning and Evaluation

View

2.1.1

 

2.1.1.1

 

2.1.1.2

Average Enrolment percentage

 

a)    Number of Students admitted during the year –wise during last five years

 

b)    Number of sanctioned seats year wise during last five years

 

1. Template

 

 

2. University Affiliation letter & 1st year Admission Approval copy

2.1.2

 

 

 

 

2.1.2.1

Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc. as per applicable    reservation policy during the last five years (exclusive of supernumerary seats).

 

Number of actual students admitted from the reserved categories year-wise

 

1. Template

 

 

 

2. Govt. order copy on reservation policy

   

  2.2

                     Catering to Students Diversity

 

Relevant Proof

2.2.1

The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organizes special programmes for the advanced learners and slow learners.

 

1.Writeup

 

2. supporting documents of Departments

2.2.2

Students- Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year)

1. Template

  2.3

                      Teaching- Learning Process

Relevant Proof

2.3.1

Students centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies  are used for enhancing learning experiences.

1.Supporting documents of Department visits and Activities

2.3.2

Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process.

 

1.Writeup

2.ICT Classes held details

3.Annexure

2.3.3

Ratio of mentor to students for the academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year)

 

a)    Number of mentors, Number of students assigned to each mentor.

 

1.Table of Mentors

2. Mentors Manual

3. List of students and Mentors -2019-20

  2.4

                     Teacher Profile and Quality

Relevant Proof

2.4.1

Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five year.

1.Data Template

2.Sanctioned Letter by G0VT.

3.Teachers List authenticated by Principal

 

2.4.2

 

 

 

 

2.4.2.1

Average percentage of full time teachers with Phd./ D.M./ M. Ch/ D.N.B Superspecialityt /D.Sc/D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for count)

 

 

Number of full time teachers with Ph.D/ ./ D.M./ M.Ch/ D.N.B Superspeciality /D.Sc/D.Litt. during the last five years

1. Template

2. PhD certificates of Teachers

2.4.3

 

 

 

2.4.3.1

Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year)

 

Total experience of full time teachers.

 

1.Template

 

2. Appointment order copies

  2.5

              Evaluation Process and Reforms.

Relevant Proof

2.5.1

Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode.

 

1.Write up

2. IA Question Papers

3. IA Marks

2.5.2

Mechanism to deal internal examination related grievances is transparent time-bound and efficient.

 

1.Write up

 

 2. Committee list

  2.6

           Student Performance and Learning Outcome

 

2.6.1

Teachers and students are aware of the stated programme and course outcomes of the programmes offered by the institution.

 

1. Write up

2.Course outcome

3. Programme Outcome

2.6.2

Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution.

 

1.  writeup

2. template

2.6.3

 

 

2.6.3.1

 

 

2.6.3.2

Average pass percentage of students during the last five years.

 

Total Number of Final Year students who passed the university exams year-wise during the last five years.

 

Total number of final year students who appeared for the university exams year-wise during the last five years

1.Result Data

 

2. Department wise

Result ( through website)

  2.7

                    Student Satisfaction Survey

Relevant Proof

2.7.1

Students satisfaction survey (SSS) on overall institutional performances (Institution may design its own questionnaire)

(results and details need to be provided as a web ).

 

1. SSS  Details