2. Teaching, Learning and Evaluation |
2.1: | Student Enrollment and Profile |
2.1.1: | Average enrolment Percentage (Average of last five years) |
2.1.2: | Average percentage of seats filled against reserved categories (SC, ST, OBC, Divyangjan, etc., as per applicable reservation policy) during the last five years |
2.2: | Catering to Student Diversity |
2.2.1: | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special programmes for advanced learners and slow learners |
2.2.2: | Student-Full time teacher ratio (Data for the academic year 2019 - 2020) |
2.3: | Teaching, Learning Process |
2.3.1: | Student-centric methods such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem-solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences |
| 1. Industrial Visit |
| 2. Heritage Club and Coin Exhibition |
2.3.2: | Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process |
2.3.3: | Ratio of students to mentor for academic and other related issues (Data for the latest completed academic year) |
| 1. Mentor-Mentee Ratio |
| 2. Mentors and Mentees Circulars |
| 3. Number of students enrolled and full-time teachers on roll |
2.4: | Teacher Profile and Quality |
2.4.1: | Average percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last years |
| 1. Average percentage of full-time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years |
| 2. List of faculty members for the academic year 2019 - 2020 |
| 3. Number of sanctioned teaching post yearwise for last 5 years |
2.4.2: | Average percentage of full-time teachers with Ph.D/ D.M./M.ch./D.N.B Superseniority/D.Sc./D.Litt. during the last five years (consider only highest degree for the count) |
| 1. Details of fulltime teachers with Ph.D for last five years |
| 2. Ph.D certificates of full time teachers for the last five years |
2.4.3: | Average teaching experience of full-time teachers in the same institution (Data for the latest completed academic year in number of years) |
2.5: | Evaluation Process and Reforms |
2.5.1: | Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode |
| 1. Internal Assessment Examination Table |
| 2. Internal Assessment Examination Case Study |
2.5.2: | Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time-bound and efficient |
2.6: | Student Performance and Learning Outcomes |
2.6.1: | Programm and course outcomes for all programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on the website and communicated to teachers and students |
| 1. Program Outcome |
| 2. Course Outcome |
2.6.2: | Attainment of programme outcome and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution |
2.6.3: | Average pass percentage of students during last five years |
| 1. Result analysis for the last five years |
| 2. Rank Certificate |
| 3. Internal and university examination result Course | Sem | 2015 - 2016 | 2016 - 2017 | 2017 - 2018 | 2018 - 2019 | 2019 - 2020 | IA | Exam | IA | Exam | IA | Exam | IA | Exam | IA | Exam | B.A | All | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | B.Com | All | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | BBA | All | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | B.Sc | All | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | College | University | |
2.7: | Student Satisfactory Survey |